Film, Art, and the Limits of Science
In Defence of Humanistic Explanation
- Publisher's listprice EUR 149.79
-
63 540 Ft (60 515 Ft + 5% VAT)
The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.
- Discount 8% (cc. 5 083 Ft off)
- Discounted price 58 457 Ft (55 674 Ft + 5% VAT)
63 540 Ft
Availability
Not yet published.
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.
Product details:
- Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
- Date of Publication 30 May 2025
- Number of Volumes 1 pieces, Book
- ISBN 9783031832345
- Binding Hardback
- No. of pages374 pages
- Size 210x148 mm
- Language English
- Illustrations 6 Illustrations, black & white; 1 Illustrations, color 700
Categories
Short description:
There is currently a vigorous debate in film studies and related disciplines about the extent to which scientific paradigms like evolutionary psychology and neuroscience can explain the cinema and other artforms. This debate tends to devolve into extreme positions, with many film scholars and other humanists insisting that science has little or no role to play in the study of the arts, while a minority contends that it is always needed to fully account for cultural phenomena like film.
Malcolm Turvey advocates for a more moderate position. He argues that, while the sciences can explain much about film and the other arts, there is much about these phenomena that only humanistic methods can account for. He thereby mounts a trenchant defence of the purpose and value of humanistic explanation, one that nevertheless acknowledges and welcomes the legitimate contribution of the sciences to the study of the arts.
Malcolm Turvey is Sol Gittleman Professor in the Department of the History of Art and Architecture at Tufts University and was the founding Director (2015-2021) of Tufts' Film & Media Studies Program. He is also an editor of the journal October.
MoreLong description:
There is currently a vigorous debate in film studies and related disciplines about the extent to which scientific paradigms like evolutionary psychology and neuroscience can explain the cinema and other artforms. This debate tends to devolve into extreme positions, with many film scholars and other humanists insisting that science has little or no role to play in the study of the arts, while a minority contends that it is always needed to fully account for cultural phenomena like film.
Malcolm Turvey advocates for a more moderate position. He argues that, while the sciences can explain much about film and the other arts, there is much about these phenomena that only humanistic methods can account for. He thereby mounts a trenchant defence of the purpose and value of humanistic explanation, one that nevertheless acknowledges and welcomes the legitimate contribution of the sciences to the study of the arts.
MoreTable of Contents:
Introduction Moderate Autonomism and Serious Pessimism.- Wittgenstein, Science, and Moderate Autonomism.- Moderate Autonomism, Extreme Autonomism, and Anti-Autonomism.- Norms, Normativity, and the Internal Perspective.- Serious Pessimism and Evolutionary Psychology.- Serious Pessimism and Mirror Neurons.- Conclusion The Limits of Science.
More
