Evaluating Research in Academic Journals - Tcherni-Buzzeo, Maria; Pyrczak, Fred; - Prospero Internetes Könyváruház
Kosár (0)
Kívánságlista (0)
Értesítés a kedvenc témákról
__

Evaluating Research in Academic Journals

A Practical Guide to Realistic Evaluation
 
Kiadás sorszáma: 7, New edition
Kiadó: Routledge
Megjelenés dátuma:
 
Normál ár:
Kiadói listaár:
GBP 54.99
Becsült forint ár:
28 869 Ft (27 495 Ft + 5% áfa)
Miért becsült?
 
Az Ön ára:
25 983 (24 746 Ft + 5% áfa )
Kedvezmény(ek): 10% (kb. 2 887 Ft)
A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
Kattintson ide a feliratkozáshoz
 
Beszerezhetőség:
A kiadónál véglegesen elfogyott, nem rendelhető. Érdemes újra keresni a címmel, hátha van újabb kiadás.
Nem tudnak pontosabbat?
 
 
Rövid leírás:

Evaluating Research in Academic Journals is a guide for students who are learning how to evaluate reports of empirical research published in academic journals. It breaks down the process of evaluating journal research into easy-to-understand steps, and emphasizes the practical aspects of evaluating research.

Hosszú leírás:

Evaluating Research in Academic Journals is a guide for students who are learning how to evaluate reports of empirical research published in academic journals. It breaks down the process of evaluating a journal article into easy-to-understand steps, and emphasizes the practical aspects of evaluating research ? not just how to apply a list of technical terms from textbooks.



The book avoids oversimplification in the evaluation process by describing the nuances that may make an article publishable even when it has serious methodological flaws. Students learn when and why certain types of flaws may be tolerated, and why evaluation should not be performed mechanically.



Each chapter is organized around evaluation questions. For each question, there is a concise explanation of how to apply it in the evaluation of research reports. Numerous examples from journals in the social and behavioral sciences illustrate the application of the evaluation questions, and demonstrate actual examples of strong and weak features of published reports. Common-sense models for evaluation combined with a lack of jargon make it possible for students to start evaluating research articles the first week of class.



New to this edition




  • New chapters on:




    • evaluating mixed methods research



    • evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses



    • program evaluation research



  • Updated chapters and appendices that provide more comprehensive information and recent examples



  • Full new online resources: test bank questions and PowerPoint slides for instructors, and self-test chapter quizzes, further readings and additional journal examples for students.
Tartalomjegyzék:

Introduction to the Seventh Edition



1. Background for Evaluating Research Reports


2. Evaluating Titles


3. Evaluating Abstracts


4. Evaluating Introductions and Literature Reviews


5. A Closer Look at Evaluating Literature Reviews


6. Evaluating Samples When Researchers Generalize


7. Evaluating Samples When Researchers Do Not Generalize


8. Evaluating Measures


9. Evaluating Experimental Procedures


10. Evaluating Analysis and Results Sections: Quantitative Research


11. Evaluating Analysis and Results Sections: Qualitative Research


12. Evaluating Analysis and Results Sections: Mixed Methods Research Anne Lee Kringen


13. Evaluating Discussion Sections


14. Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Towards Evidence-Based Practice


15. Putting It All Together



Appendix A: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Research: An Overview


Appendix B: A Special Case of Program or Policy Evaluation


Appendix C: The Limitations of Significance Testing


Appendix D: Checklist of Evaluation Questions