The Weight of Reasons - Tucker, Chris; - Prospero Internetes Könyváruház

 
A termék adatai:

ISBN13:9780197786925
ISBN10:0197786928
Kötéstípus:Keménykötés
Terjedelem:376 oldal
Méret:210x149x38 mm
Súly:499 g
Nyelv:angol
Illusztrációk: 10 b/w illustrations
700
Témakör:

The Weight of Reasons

A Framework for Ethics
 
Kiadó: OUP USA
Megjelenés dátuma:
 
Normál ár:

Kiadói listaár:
GBP 86.00
Becsült forint ár:
43 524 Ft (41 452 Ft + 5% áfa)
Miért becsült?
 
Az Ön ára:

39 172 (37 307 Ft + 5% áfa )
Kedvezmény(ek): 10% (kb. 4 352 Ft)
A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
Kattintson ide a feliratkozáshoz
 
Beszerezhetőség:

Még nem jelent meg, de rendelhető. A megjelenéstől számított néhány héten belül megérkezik.
 
  példányt

 
Rövid leírás:

In The Weight of Reasons, Chris Tucker offers a comprehensive approach to weighing reasons, proposing a new model, Dual Scale, that illuminates how reasons interact to determine whether an action is permissible, required, and/or supererogatory.

Hosszú leírás:
In his comprehensive guide to weighing reasons, Chris Tucker explains how to weigh reasons well, from daily choices to complex ethical puzzles.

There are two central claims in the book. The first concerns the weights of reasons, namely Weight Pluralism, the idea that reasons have more than one weight value and these values are not always equal. A reason's justifying weight is how well it makes an act permissible. A reason's requiring weight is how well it makes a permissible act required. For instance, the self-interested reasons that make it permissible to go out for dinner one night generally do not also make it impermissible or wrong to stay home instead. This fact is to be explained, Tucker argues, by holding that self-interested reasons have more justifying than requiring weight.

The second central claim concerns weighing reasons. The most natural model for weighing reasons is Single Scale: the idea that reasons are weighed on a single two-sided scale. Since our reasons to eat out have more justifying weight than requiring weight, Single Scale distorts how those reasons work. If one were to put the reasons to go out on the left pan and the reasons to stay home on the right pan, and the reasons to go out are weightier, then Single Scale incorrectly entails that you are required to eat out--i.e., eating out is permissible/okay and staying home is impermissible/wrong. This verdict is incorrect because the self-interested reasons that make it permissible to go out to eat tonight generally do not also make it wrong to stay home instead. To properly represent such reasons, Tucker replaces Single Scale with Dual Scale, which is the idea that reasons are weighed on two scales rather than one.

The book also addresses what the general issue of weighing reasons is, whether they have commending weight, whether weight values are context sensitive, how to tell what the weights of reasons are, how reasons for are related to reasons against, and how the weights of reasons aggregate.

This impressive book will advance an important and fundamental debate in ethics and metaethics. The author gives the most sophisticated development and defence I have seen of 'Weight Pluralism', roughly the view that practical reasons are associated with at least two distinct kinds of weight
Tartalomjegyzék:
Introduction
Part I. Weighty Matters
Minding the Metaphors of Weight and Weighing
A Holist Balance Scale
Part II. From Single to Dual Scale
The Representational Limits of Single Scale
The Representational Power of Dual Scale
Weighing Reasons Against
Part III. Ethical Puzzles Resolved
Against Weight Monism
Moral Options and the Normative Significance of Small Improvements
The All or Nothing Ranking Reversal and the Unity of Morality
Part IV. Wrapping Up
Modeling Requirement for Any Number of Options
Conclusion